Friday, September 18, 2009

UPM lecturers hauled up over plagiarism

Tuesday September 15, 2009
UPM lecturers hauled up over plagiarism
By KAREN CHAPMAN


PETALING JAYA: A stern warning will be given to two Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) lecturers for plagiarising materials from the Internet to produce a guide book.

UPM vice-chancellor Prof Datuk Dr Nik Mustapha R. Abdullah said this warning would also be included in their service records, which would affect their promotion.

“The management decided to take this action following advice from the legal department that the two be given very stern warnings,” he said when contacted.

Prof Dr Nik Mustapha said the university viewed the case seriously and did not condone it.

“No one will be suspended but they have to return any royalty received,” he said.

He said the guide books would be removed from the (university’s) shelves immediately.

He was commenting on a news report that two UPM lecturers had plagiarised materials to produce a guide book on writing effective resumes for management students.

Prof Dr Nik Mustapha said the legal department had made suggestions to the management on the disciplinary action to be taken after personally meeting the authors.

“The junior author, who recently completed her PhD, said that since the source was from the Internet, she thought the information was in the public domain and as such did not cite the article,” he said.

Prof Dr Nik Mustapha said the senior author admitted to the legal team that the manuscript looked all right to him, not realising that it was taken from another work.

“Since this is a guide book, we decided that the punishment was reasonable,” he said.

Prof Dr Nik Mustapha said that the two authors have apologised for their ignorance, adding that the plagiarism did not affect UPM undergraduates as the work was not a textbook.

Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin when contacted said the ministry viewed the matter seriously. “We will leave it to the university to conduct an investigation and take action,” he said.

------------------------------------------

Published: Wednesday September 16, 2009 MYT 4:23:00 PM
Sack plagiarising lecturers, says DCM II
By ANN TAN


anntan@thestar.com.my

GEORGE TOWN: Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM) should have sacked its two lecturers for plagiarising materials from the Internet to produce a guidebook.

Deputy Chief Minister II Dr P. Ramasamy, a former Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) political science professor, said the stern warning issued to them was not good enough.

“Plagiarism is the most serious ‘crime’ in a university.

“I once came across a lecturer who was involved in plagiarism in UKM but the only action taken against him was to freeze his promotion and pay rise.

“He later went to teach in another university and was promoted to professor,” he said at a press conference at Komtar on Wednesday.

He was commenting on a recent report in The Star quoting UPM vice-chancellor Prof Datuk Dr Nik Mustapha R. Abdullah as saying that the warning would be included in their service records, which would affect their promotion.

He had said no one would be suspended but they have to return any royalty received.

Dr Ramasamy, who is also the state Economic Planning, Education and Human Resources, Science, Technology and Innovation Committee chairman, said the Higher Education Ministry should set up a special committee to investigate the issue of plagiarism.

“Otherwise, students will follow (this example) and become copycats since their own lecturers did the same.

“The cases of plagiarism among students in universities, be it public or private universities, have been very rampant over these years and it is sad that we closed the matter like that,” he said.

Related Stories:
UPM lecturers hauled up over plagiarism

Abstrak

PROFESSIONALISM AMONG ACADEMICIANS: A LITERATURE REVIEW

ABSTRACT

UKM is committed to be a leading university that pioneers innovation in the construction of knowledge to achieve the aspiration of producing a society imbued with dynamic, learned and civic leadership. In achieving the vision, professionalism among staff, particularly the academicians is deemed to be primary concern. In building understanding about professionalism among academicians, one needs to be well-grounded in related literature. This article offers review of related literature on professionalism among academicians from 1999. Among the issues emerged from the literature are perception of academicians towards teaching profession, professional development, enhancement of teaching profession, and ethical challenges.

Sinopsis Penyelidikan

(i) Sinopsis Penyelidikan:

UKM ialah sebuah universiti yang mempunyai peranan yang unik berbanding dengan IPTA-IPTA lain di Malaysia. Ini dapat dilihat daripada peranannya untuk memartabatkan Bahasa Melayu sebagai bahasa ilmu. Peranan ini menjadi latarbelakang kepada usaha UKM untuk membentuk ahli-ahli akademik yang mempunyai nilai profesionalisme yang tinggi. Untuk perspektif ahli-ahli akademik pula, mereka perlu berpegang kepada nilai-nilai professionalisme demi untuk memartabatkan kualiti pendidikan hingga ke peringkat dunia. Ini sesuai dengan visi UKM bertekad menjadi Universiti terulung yang menjadi pelopor inovasi mendahului langkah masyarakat dan zamannya bagi membentuk masyarakat dinamis, berilmu dan berakhlak mulia. Untuk memberikan sumbangan ke arah visi tersebut, aspek professionalisme di kalangan ahli-ahli akademik adalah satu perkara penting.

(ii) Objektif Penyelidikan:

Kajian ini secara umumnya bertujuan untuk:
1. Mengkaji persepsi ahli-ahli akademik terhadap profesion mereka.
2. Mengkaji bagaimana mereka membentuk kepakaran dalam profesion mereka mereka.
3. Mengkaji sejauh mana polisi-polisi UKM memberikan kesan terhadap profesion mereka.

(iii) Metodologi Penyelidikan:

Kajian menggunakan ini melibatkan kaedah utama iaitu kualitatif. Kaedah kualitatif digunakan di mana temubual secara mendalam dijalankan di kalangan ahli-ahli akademik yang terpilih dalam rangka untuk membina instrumen kajian. Ahli-ahli akademik yang akan ditemubual dipilih daripada mereka yang mempunyai tahap professionalisme yang tinggi dari perspektif pihak pengurusan atasan. Untuk memilih informan yang akan ditemubual, penyelidik akan mendapatkan rekomendasi daripada input daripada temubual ini digunakan membina inventori item dalam soal selidik. Dijangka 4 hingga 7 orang informan akan dipilih berdasarkan persampelan kriteria dan teknik snowballing.

Rujukan

Avis, J., & Bathnaker, A. C. 2004. Critical Pedagogy, Performativity and a politics of hope: Trainee further education lecturer practice. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 9(2), 301-313

Avis, J., Bathmaker, A., & Parsons, J. 2002. Communities of practice and the construction of
learners in post-compulsory education and training. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 54(1), 27 — 50.

Hill, R. 2000. A Study of the views of full-time further education lecturers regarding their college corporations and agencies of the further education sector. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 24(1), 67 — 75.

Lomas, L., & Nicholls, G. 2005. Enhancing Teaching Quality Through Peer Review of Teaching. Quality in Higher Education,11(2),137 — 149.

MacFarlane, B. 2001. Justice and lecturer professionalism. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 141-152.

Skelton, A. 2002. Towards Inclusive Learning Environments in Higher Education? Reflections on a Professional Development Course for University Lecturers. Teaching in Higher Education, 7(2), 193 — 214.


Jangkaan Output Penyelidikan:

Data daripada penyelidikan kualitatif ini dijangkakan akan menghasilkan output-output berikut:
1. Dapat memberikan garis panduan kepada pembuat dasar ke arah memantapkan lagi tahap profesionalisme di kalangan ahli-ahli akademik UKM.
2. Dapat memberikan kefahaman tentang contoh amalan-amalan terbaik ahli-ahli akademik dalam memperkembangkan profesion mereka.
3. Dapat memberikan gambaran terhadap sejauh mana polisi-polisi yang diamalkan UKM memberikan kesan terhadap perkembangan profesion ahli-ahli akademik.

Borang pdf